First-line Systemic Therapy in Patients Ineligible (‘Unfit’) to Receive a Cisplatin-based Regimen – Which Patients? What Needs?

European Oncology & Haematology, 2013;9(Suppl. 1):13-6

Standard Chemotherapy in ‘Fit’ Bladder Cancer Patients
First-line treatment options in ‘fit’ bladder cancer patients who are able to receive platinum-based therapy include GC, paclitaxel/gemcitabine/cisplatin (PGC), methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin (MVAC) with or without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), or high-dose (HD)-MVAC with G-CSF. The highest level of evidence and grade of recommendation is available for all these combinations.1,2 Some patients display long-term survival following cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy, with 5-year survival rates of approximately 15 %. Moreover, as outlined earlier, patients with lymph node (LN)-only metastases (i.e. no visceral metastases) have better 5-year survival rates (see Table 1).3,4

Chronological versus Functional Age
An important reality in the treatment of bladder cancer is the fact that populations are growing older overall. The incidence of invasive cancer in patients above the age of 65 years is expected to increase dramatically in the next few years.5 Therefore, the matter of comorbid conditions in elderly patients, which is associated with prognostic implications, will become more prominent.6,7 Importantly, an identical chronological age may correspond to a different functional age. Age does not necessarily mean that a patient is unfit to receive platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients are not routinely categorised according to their absolute age. The treatment of bladder cancer in elderly patients is met with a series of challenges, derived from the use of cisplatin, which forms the backbone of standard treatment.

Cisplatin versus Carboplatin in Bladder Cancer Patients
There have been a lot of discussions about the use of cisplatin in the treatment of bladder cancer, specifically in terms of whether this agent is required as part of combination chemotherapy regimens, and whether it is necessary to separate cisplatin-eligible and -ineligible patients.8,9 Currently, there are no data from randomised phase III studies addressing this concern. Whether cisplatin can be replaced safely by carboplatin in cisplatin-eligible patients was investigated in one randomised phase III trial comparing MVAC versus carboplatin plus paclitaxel that was closed early due to slow accrual.10 Other randomised phase II studies compared various cisplatin- and carboplatin-based combinations in patients with recurrent or metastatic bladder cancer. The overarching impression is that carboplatin-based chemotherapy is less active, with reduced CR and survival rates (see Table 2).11–13 Furthermore, several smaller phase II studies evaluating carboplatin in combination with paclitaxel resulted in mediocre outcomes, with OS durations of approximately 9 months and responses below 50 %.14–16

So far, no standard chemotherapy has been established in patients who are ‘unfit’ to receive cisplatin. Approximately 50 % of urothelial cancer patients are not eligible to receive standard cisplatin-based chemotherapy.17–20 Comorbidity and age concerns mean that elderly patients are often under-represented in clinical trials, which makes them unrealistic, because these are representative of a large proportion of bladder cancer patients.21 Patients with a history of cancer have been shown to have an average of three comorbid conditions,22 yet the importance of comorbidity has not consistently been addressed in clinical trials and clinical practice since coming to attention over 40 years ago.23 Clinical trials have tended to exclude elderly patients and/or those with comorbidities, and it is therefore not established whether dosages investigated in clinical trials are safe in the elderly and comorbid population.

Can comorbidity, age, or sex predict risk of mortality in elderly patients? Interesting data have come to the fore, showing that age, sex and comorbidity in particular can be predictive of mortality in elderly patients. Different index scores have been developed to gauge the importance of these factors in patient outcome, but these have so far not been included in clinical trial designs (see Table 3).5,24–27

When deciding on chemotherapy treatment in elderly cancer patients, Wedding et al. have shown in a prospective trial that a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) distinguishes fit patients from vulnerable or frail patients with more precision compared with physician’s evaluations.28 The advantage of using the CGA in elderly patients (≥75 years) is that this assessment provides a description of physiological age. The CGA can detect reversible issues, provide a cognitive function assessment and improve anti-cancer treatment. Although it is not standard, the CGA is recommended for routine use in the older patient population with cancer by several international societies.29,30 The CGA is, however, a time-consuming and costly approach that requires further validation.

In a recent publication by Hurria et al., a score was constructed to predict chemotherapy toxicity in older adults with cancer, with more accuracy than Karnofsky performance score (KPS) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) PS. This score was presented as being short and feasible in daily practice, by assessing tumour and treatment variables, socio-demographic factors, laboratory test results and geriatric assessment variables (including function, comorbidity, cognition, psychological state, social activity/support and nutritional status).31

References:
  1. Bellmunt J, von der Maase H, Mead GM, et al., Randomized phase III study comparing paclitaxel/cisplatin/gemcitabine and gemcitabine/cisplatin in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer without prior systemic therapy: EORTC Intergroup Study 30987, J Clin Oncol, 2012;30(10):1107–13.
  2. Stenzl A, Witjes JA, Comperat E, et al., Guidelines on Bladder Cancer Muscle-invasive and Metastatic. European Association of Urology. 2012 (Febuary 2012 update). Available at: http://www.uroweb.org (accessed 7 November 2013).
  3. Sternberg CN, de Mulder P, Schornagel JH, et al., Seven year update of an EORTC phase III trial of high-dose intensity M-VAC chemotherapy and G-CSF versus classic M-VAC in advanced urothelial tract tumours, Eur J Cancer, 2006;42(1):50–54.
  4. von der Maase H, Sengelov L, Roberts JT, et al., Long-term survival results of a randomized trial comparing gemcitabine plus cisplatin, with methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, plus cisplatin in patients with bladder cancer, J Clin Oncol, 2005;23(21):4602–8.
  5. Pal SK, Hurria A, Impact of age, sex, and comorbidity on cancer therapy and disease progression, J Clin Oncol, 2010;28(26):4086–93.
  6. Yancik R, Cancer burden in the aged: an epidemiologic and demographic overview, Cancer, 1997;80(7):1273–83.
  7. Piccirillo JF, Tierney RM, Costas I, et al., Prognostic importance of comorbidity in a hospital-based cancer registry, JAMA, 2004;291(20):2441–7.
  8. De Santis M, Bellmunt J, Mead G, et al., Randomized phase II/III trial assessing gemcitabine/ carboplatin and methotrexate/carboplatin/vinblastine in patients with advanced urothelial cancer ‘unfit’ for cisplatin-based chemotherapy: phase II –results of EORTC study 30986, J Clin Oncol, 2009;27(33):5634–9.
  9. Sonpavde G, Galsky MD, Vogelzang NJ, First-line systemic therapy trials for advanced transitional-cell carcinoma of the urothelium: should we stop separating cisplatin-eligible and -ineligible patients?, J Clin Oncol, 2010;28(25):e441–2; author reply e3–4.
  10. Dreicer R, Manola J, Roth BJ, et al., Phase III trial of methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin versus carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with advanced carcinoma of the urothelium, Cancer, 2004;100(8):1639–45.
  11. Petrioli R, Frediani B, Manganelli A, et al., Comparison between a cisplatin-containing regimen and a carboplatin-containing regimen for recurrent or metastatic bladder cancer patients. A randomized phase II study, Cancer, 1996;77(2):344–51.
  12. Bellmunt J, Ribas A, Eres N, et al., Carboplatin-based versus cisplatin-based chemotherapy in the treatment of surgically incurable advanced bladder carcinoma, Cancer, 1997;80(10):1966–72.
  13. Dogliotti L, Carteni G, Siena S, et al., Gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus gemcitabine plus carboplatin as first-line chemotherapy in advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium: results of a randomized phase 2 trial, Eur Urol, 2007;52(1):134–41.
  14. Redman BG, Smith DC, Flaherty L, et al., Phase II trial of paclitaxel and carboplatin in the treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma, J Clin Oncol, 1998;16(5):1844–8.
  15. Vaughn DJ, Malkowicz SB, Zoltick B, et al., Paclitaxel plus carboplatin in advanced carcinoma of the urothelium: an active and tolerable outpatient regimen, J Clin Oncol, 1998;16(1):255–60.
  16. Small EJ, Lew D, Redman BG, et al., Southwest Oncology Group Study of paclitaxel and carboplatin for advanced transitional-cell carcinoma: the importance of survival as a clinical trial end point, J Clin Oncol, 2000;18(13):2537–44.
  17. Dash A, Galsky MD, Vickers AJ, et al., Impact of renal impairment on eligibility for adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy in patients with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder, Cancer, 2006;107(3):506–13.
  18. Nogue-Aliguer M, Carles J, Arrivi A, et al., Gemcitabine and carboplatin in advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary tract: an alternative therapy, Cancer, 2003;97(9):2180–86.
  19. Balducci L, Extermann M, Management of cancer in the older person: a practical approach, Oncologist, 2000;5(3):224–37.
  20. De Santis M, Bachner M, New developments in first- and second-line chemotherapy for transitional cell, squamous cell and adenocarcinoma of the bladder, Curr Opin Urol, 2007;17(5):363–8.
  21. Boyd CM, Darer J, Boult C, et al., Clinical practice guidelines and quality of care for older patients with multiple comorbid diseases: implications for pay for performance, JAMA, 2005;294(6):716–24.
  22. Seo PH, Pieper CF, Cohen HJ, Effects of cancer history and comorbid conditions on mortality and healthcare use among older cancer survivors, Cancer, 2004;101(10):2276–84.
  23. Fenstein AR, The pre-therapeutic classification of co-morbidity in chronic disease, J Chron Dis, 1970;23(7):455–68.
  24. Charlson M, Szatrowski TP, Peterson J, Gold J, Validation of a combined comorbidity index, J Clin Epidemiol, 1994;47(11):1245–51.
  25. Inouye SK, Peduzzi PN, Robison JT, et al., Importance of functional measures in predicting mortality among older hospitalized patients, JAMA, 1998;279(15):1187–93.
  26. Lee SJ, Lindquist K, Segal MR, Covinsky KE, Development and validation of a prognostic index for 4-year mortality in older adults, JAMA, 2006;295(7):801–8.
  27. Walter LC, Brand RJ, Counsell SR, et al., Development and validation of a prognostic index for 1-year mortality in older adults after hospitalization, JAMA, 2001;285(23):2987–94.
  28. Wedding U, Kodding D, Pientka L, et al., Physicians’ judgement and comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) select different patients as fit for chemotherapy, Crit Rev Oncol Hematol, 2007;64(1):1–9.
  29. Extermann M, Chen H, Booth-Jones M, et al., Pilot testing of the computerized cognitive test Microcog in chemotherapy-treated older cancer patients, Crit Rev Oncol Hematol, 2005;54(2):137–43.
  30. Balducci L, Cohen HJ, Engstrom PF, et al., Senior adult oncology clinical practice guidelines in oncology, J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2005;3(4):572–90.
  31. Hurria A, Togawa K, Mohile SG, et al., Predicting chemotherapy toxicity in older adults with cancer: a prospective multicenter study, J Clin Oncol, 2011;29(25):3457–65.
  32. Yamamoto N, Tamura T, Maeda M, et al., The influence of ageing on cisplatin pharmacokinetics in lung cancer patients with normal organ function, Cancer Chemother Pharmacol, 1995;36(2):102–6.
  33. Raj GV, Iasonos A, Herr H, Donat SM, Formulas calculating creatinine clearance are inadequate for determining eligibility for Cisplatin-based chemotherapy in bladder cancer, J Clin Oncol, 2006;24(19):3095–100.
  34. Galsky MD, Hahn NM, Rosenberg J, et al., Treatment of patients with metastatic urothelial cancer ‘unfit’ for Cisplatin-based chemotherapy, J Clin Oncol, 2011;29(17):2432–8.
  35. De Santis M, Bellmunt J, Mead G, et al., Randomized phase II/III trial assessing gemcitabine/carboplatin and methotrexate/carboplatin/vinblastine in patients with advanced urothelial cancer who are unfit for cisplatin-based chemotherapy: EORTC study 30986, J Clin Oncol, 2012;30(2):191–9.
  36. Bellmunt J, de Wit R, Albanell J, Baselga J, A feasibility study of carboplatin with fixed dose of gemcitabine in ‘unfit’ patients with advanced bladder cancer, Eur J Cancer, 2001;37(17):2212–5.
  37. Bajorin DF, Dodd PM, Mazumdar M, et al., Long-term survival in metastatic transitional-cell carcinoma and prognostic factors predicting outcome of therapy, J Clin Oncol, 1999;17(10):3173–81.
  38. Balar AV, Apolo AB, Ostrovnaya I, et al., Phase II study of gemcitabine, carboplatin, and bevacizumab in patients with advanced unresectable or metastatic urothelial cancer, J Clin Oncol, 2013;31(6):724–30.