Potential Role of Vinflunine in Two-tiered Treatment Strategies – Perioperative and Maintenance Therapy

European Oncology & Haematology, 2013;9(Suppl. 1):8-12

The potential role of vinflunine in sequential treatment strategies for urothelial carcinoma, in both the perioperative setting and maintenance therapy, will be highlighted below.

Rationale for Perioperative Systematic Therapy in Bladder Cancer
The natural history and evolution of urothelial carcinoma suggests that the study of perioperative systemic therapy may yield benefits (see Table 1),1–9 because 20–50 % of patients experience distant recurrence, and 5–15 % have locoregional recurrence.

The gold standard for patients with muscle-infiltrating disease is cystectomy. However, when comparing cystectomy series, survival is strictly related to the invasion of the bladder wall (see Table 1). The probability of non-recurring and organ-confined disease is approximately 80–90 %, while in patients with extravesical invasion it drops to 60 % and to 30 % in patients with nodal involvement after cystectomy. These figures explain why perioperative chemotherapy is an attractive option. Based on good responses obtained in advanced disease, chemotherapy is shifting to the neoadjuvant setting.

Long-term results of radical cystectomy in the treatment of invasivebladder cancer were presented by Stein et al. in 1,054 patients. Increasing tumour stage and nodal involvement were associated with significantly higher recurrence rates and worse overall survival (OS) (p<0.001). Specifically, patients with extravesical disease or lymph node positive (LN+) disease had a higher risk of recurrence compared withpatients who had organ-confined disease. The 10-year OS for patients with extravesical bladder tumours was 27 %. In patients with LN+ disease the OS at 10 years was 23 %. Respective recurrence-free values were 47 % and 31 %.5 These data provide a strong biological rationale for perioperative systemic therapy in bladder cancer.

Neoadjuvant or Adjuvant Therapy in Invasive Bladder Cancer
Several unanswered questions arise when gauging perioperative treatment options and the timing of cystectomy in patients with invasive bladder cancer. For instance, should radical cystectomy be performed without delay or is neoadjuvant chemotherapy a valid strategy? Should cystectomy be performed regardless of chemotherapy? Should the bladder be preserved and cystectomy be delayed according to chemotherapeutic response? Should adjuvant chemotherapy be administered, and if so, which regimen would be the most suitable?

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
Based on the encouraging results obtained with cisplatin combination chemotherapy regimens in patients with advanced, metastatic disease, use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been advocated to improve survival in patients with micrometastatic disease, and second,to preserve the bladder. It is thought that therapy may be better tolerated in patients upfront prior to cystectomy. On the other hand, neoadjuvant chemotherapy may make surgery more challenging and increase post-operative complications. A malignancy that is resistant to neoadjuvant chemotherapy may progress due to delay of surgery. Other disadvantages associated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy include difficulties in assessing response, and the fact that staging is based on clinical rather than pathological criteria. Benefits obtained in some studies are not reproducible. Only meta-analyses allowed to show a survival benefit ranging from 5 to 7 % (see Table 2).

Almost all neoadjuvant chemotherapy trials were negative, except for that conducted by the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) in 317 patients,which compared methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin (MVAC) followed by cystectomy versus cystectomy alone. The median survival for patients treated with neoadjuvant MVAC was 77 months compared with 46 months in patients treated with cystectomy alone (p=0.06). Respective 5-year survival was 57 % versus 43 %. The results achieved borderline statistical significance due to a long accrual and follow-up period. Patients treated with surgery alone had a 33 % greater risk of death compared with those treated with combination therapy (hazard ration [HR]=1.33, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.00 to 1.76).8 These data strongly support the argument that neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy should be further investigated as an approach to optimise muscle-invasive bladder cancer treatment.

A subsequent retrospective analysis showed that patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and successful surgery, having had more than 10 lymph nodes removed, had a 5-year survival of 81 %, whereas patients who did not receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy and had fewer than 10 lymph nodes removed had a 5-year survival of 39 %.15 Surgical factors, therefore, have a considerable impact on bladder cancer outcome, and many factors are determinant for survival (see Table 3). The quality of surgery cannot be underestimated.

The largest neoadjuvant chemotherapy randomised trial was performed in 976 patients with T2–T4 muscle-invasive N0 urothelial cancer.10 Patients were randomised to three cycles of cisplatin, methotrexate and vinblastine (CMV) versus no CMV, followed by either cystectomy or radiotherapy local treatment that was left to the investigator’s discretion. When first published in 1999,16 the data did not reach statistical significance, but at 7 years of follow-up, a 6 % survival difference in favour of patients treated with neoadjuvant CMV was reported, and the results reached borderline significance (HR=0.85, 95 % CI 0.72–1.00; p=0.048).11 With a longer follow-up of 10 years (median follow up of 8 years), the 6 % survival difference was maintained with neoadjuvant CMV (HR=0.84, 95 % CI 0.72–0.99; p=0.037).17

References:
  1. Roehrborn CG, Sagalowsky AI, Peters PC, Long-term patient survival after cystectomy for regional metastatic transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder, J Urol, 1991;146(1):36–9.
  2. Pagano F, Bassi P, Galetti TP, et al., Results of contemporary radical cystectomy for invasive bladder cancer: a clinicopathological study with an emphasis on the inadequacy of the tumor, nodes and metastases classification, J Urol, 1991;145(1):45–50.
  3. Wishnow KI, Levinson AK, Johnson DE, et al., Stage B (P2/3A/N0) transitional cell carcinoma of bladder highly curable by radical cystectomy, Urology, 1992;39(1):12–16.
  4. Waehre H, Ous S, Klevmark B, et al., A bladder cancer multi-institutional experience with total cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer, Cancer, 1993;72(10):3044–51.
  5. Vieweg J, Gschwend JE, Herr HW, Fair WR, The impact of primary stage on survival in patients with lymph node positive bladder cancer, J Urol, 1999;161(1):72–6.
  6. Stein JP, Lieskovsky G, Cote R, Groshen S, et al., Radical cystectomy in the treatment of invasive bladder cancer: long-term results in 1,054 patients, J Clin Oncol, 2001;19(3):666–75.
  7. Dalbagni G, Genega E, Hashibe M, Zhang ZF, et al., Cystectomy for bladder cancer: a contemporary series, J Urol, 2001;165(4):1111–6.
  8. Madersbacher S, Hochreiter W, Burkhard F, et al., Radical cystectomy for bladder cancer today – a homogeneous series without neoadjuvant therapy, J Clin Oncol, 2003;21(4):690–96.
  9. Grossman HB, Natale RB, Tangen CM, et al., Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus cystectomy compared with cystectomy alone for locally advanced bladder cancer, N Engl J Med, 2003;349(9):859–66.
  10. Herr HW, Faulkner JR, Grossman HB, et al., Surgical factors influence bladder cancer outcomes: a cooperative group report, J Clin Oncol, 2004;22(14):2781–9.
  11. Malmstrom PU, Rintala E, Wahlqvist R, et al., Five-year follow-up of a prospective trial of radical cystectomy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy: Nordic Cystectomy Trial 1, J Urol, 1996;155(6):1903–6.
  12. Sherif A, Rintala E, Mestad O, et al., Neoadjuvant cisplatin-methotrexate chemotherapy for invasive bladder cancer – Nordic Cystectomy Trial 2, Scand J Urol, 2002;36(6):419–25.
  13. Bassi P, Pagano F, Pappagallo G, et al., Neo-adjuvant M-VAC of invasive bladder cancer: the GUONE multicenter phase III trial, Eur Urol, 1998;33(Suppl. 1):142.
  14. Millikan R, Dinney C, Swanson D, et al., Integrated Therapy for locally advanced bladder cancer: Final Report of a Randomized Trial of Cystectomy Plus Adjuvant M-VAC Versus Cystectomy With Both Preoperative and Postoperative M-VAC, JCO, 2001;19(20):4005–13.
  15. de Wit R, Overview of bladder cancer trials in the European Organization for Research and Treatment, Cancer, 2003;97(Suppl. 8):2120–26.
  16. Hall RR, on behalf of the Intl Collaboration of Trialists of the MRC Advanced Bladder Cancer Group, Updated results of a randomised controlled trial of neoadjuvant cisplatin (C), methotrexate (M) and vinblastine (V) chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer, Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol, 2002;21:abstract 710.
  17. Neoadjuvant cisplatin, methotrexate, and vinblastine chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a randomised controlled trial. International collaboration of trialists, Lancet, 1999;354(9178):533–40.
  18. Griffiths G, Hall R, Sylvester R, International phase III trial assessing neoadjuvant cisplatin, methotrexate, and vinblastine chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: long-term results of the BA06 30894 trial, J Clin Oncol, 2011;29(16):2171–7.
  19. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in invasive bladder cancer: update of a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data advanced bladder cancer (ABC) meta-analysis collaboration, Eur Urol, 2005;48(2):202–5.
  20. Sonpavde G, Goldman BH, Speights VO, et al., Quality of pathologic response and surgery correlate with survival for patients with completely resected bladder cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, Cancer, 2009;115(18):4104–9.
  21. Wilkinson NW, Yothers G, Lopa S, et al., Long-term survival results of surgery alone versus surgery plus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin for stage II and stage III colon cancer: pooled analysis of NSABP C-01 through C-05. A baseline from which to compare modern adjuvant trials, Ann Surg Oncol, 2010;17(4):959–66.
  22. Canter D, Long C, Kutikov A, et al., Clinicopathological outcomes after radical cystectomy for clinical T2 urothelial carcinoma: further evidence to support the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, BJU Int, 2011;107(1):58–62.
  23. Dickstein RJ, Grossman HB, Pretzsch SM, et al., Can we reliably identify patients for radical cystectomy with neoadjuvant chemotherapy? Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society of Urologic Oncology (9–10 December 2010, Bethesda, MD), abstr. 23.
  24. Adjuvant chemotherapy in invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data Advanced Bladder Cancer (ABC) Meta-analysis Collaboration, Eur Urol, 2005;48(2):189–99; discussion 99–201.
  25. Stadler WM, Lerner SP, Groshen S, et al., Phase III study of molecularly targeted adjuvant therapy in locally advanced urothelial cancer of the bladder based on p53 status, J Clin Oncol, 2011;29(25):3443–9.
  26. Souquet PJ, Krzakowski M, Ramlau R, et al., Phase I/II and pharmacokinetic study of intravenous vinflunine in combination with cisplatin for the treatment of chemonaive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, Clin Lung Cancer, 2010;11(2):105–13.
  27. Davida KA, Milowsky MI, Ritchey J, Low Incidence of Perioperative Chemotherapy for Stage III Bladder Cancer 1998 to 2003: A Report From the National Cancer Data Base, J Urol, 2007;178(2):451–4.
  28. Sternberg CN, de Mulder PH, Schornagel JH, et al., Randomized phase III trial of high-dose-intensity methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC) chemotherapy and recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor versus classic MVAC in advanced urothelial tract tumors: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Protocol no. 30924, J Clin Oncol, 2001;19(10):2638–46.
  29. von der Maase H, Hansen SW, Roberts JT, et al., Gemcitabine and cisplatin versus methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin in advanced or metastatic bladder cancer: results of a large, randomized, multinational, multicenter, phase III study, J Clin Oncol, 2000;18(17):3068–77.
  30. Bajorin DF, Dodd PM, Mazumdar M, Fazzari M, et al., Long-term survival in metastatic transitional-cell carcinoma and prognostic factors predicting outcome of therapy, J Clin Oncol, 1999;17(10):3173–81.
  31. Bellmunt J, Albanell J, Paz-Ares L, et al., Pretreatment prognostic factors for survival in patients with advanced urothelial tumors treated in a phase I/II trial with paclitaxel, cisplatin, and gemcitabine, Cancer, 2002;95(4):751–7.
  32. Bajorin DF, McCaffrey JA, Dodd PM, et al., Ifosfamide, paclitaxel, and cisplatin for patients with advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelial tract: final report of a phase II trial evaluating two dosing schedules, Cancer, 2000;88(7):1671–8.
  33. Bellmunt J, Guillem V, Paz-Ares L, et al., Phase I-II study of paclitaxel, cisplatin, and gemcitabine in advanced transitional-cell carcinoma of the urothelium. Spanish Oncology Genitourinary Group, J Clin Oncol, 2000;18(18):3247–55.
  34. Hussain M, Vaishampayan U, Du W, et al., Combination paclitaxel, carboplatin, and gemcitabine is an active treatment for advanced urothelial cancer, J Clin Oncol, 2001;19(9):2527–33.
  35. Bellmunt J, von der Maase H, Mead GM, et al., Randomized phase III study comparing paclitaxel-cisplatin-gemcitabine and gemcitabine-cisplatin in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer without prior systemic therapy: EORTC Intergroup Study 30987, J Clin Oncol, 2012;30(10):1107–13.
  36. Sternberg CN, de Mulder P, Schornagel JH, et al., Seven year update of an EORTC phase III trial of high-dose intensity M-VAC chemotherapy and G-CSF versus classic M-VAC in advanced urothelial tract tumours, Eur J Cancer, 2006;42(1):50–54.
  37. Bamias A, Dafni U, Karadimou A, et al., Prospective, open-label, randomized, phase III study of two dose-dense regimens MVAC versus gemcitabine/cisplatin in patients with inoperable, metastatic or relapsed urothelial cancer: a Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group study (HE 16/03), Ann Oncol, 2013;24(4):1011–17.
  38. Loehrer P, Einhorn LH, Elson PJ, et al., A randomized comparison of cisplatin alone or in combination with methotrexate, vinblastine, and doxorubicin in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a Cooperative Group Study, J Clin Oncol, 1992;10:1066–73.
  39. Logothetis CJ, Dexeus FH, Finn L, et al., A prospective randomized trial comparing MVAC and CISCA chemotherapy for patients with metastatic urothelial tumors, J Clin Oncol, 1990;8(6):1050–55.
  40. Bamias A, Aravantinos G, Deliveliotis C, et al., Docetaxel and cisplatin with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) versus MVAC with G-CSF in advanced urothelial carcinoma: a multicenter, randomized, phase III study from the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group, J Clin Oncol, 2004;22(2):220–28.
  41. Dreicer R, Manola J, Roth BJ, et al., Phase III trial of methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin versus carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with advanced carcinoma of the urothelium, Cancer, 2004;100(8):1639–45.
  42. Bellmunt J, Theodore C, Demkov T, et al., Phase III trial of vinflunine plus best supportive care compared with best supportive care alone after a platinum-containing regimen in patients with advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelial tract, J Clin Oncol, 2009;27(27):4454–61.
  43. Bamias A, Karadimou A, Lampaki S, et al., Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group, Athens, Greece. Prospective, randomised phase III study comparing two intensified regimens(methotrexate/vinblastin, doxorubicin hydrochloride/cisplatin(MVAC) versus gemcitabine/cisplatin) in patients with inoperable or recurrent urothelial cancer, J Clin Oncol, 2011;29(Suppl.;abstr 4510).
  44. Galsky MD, Iasonos A, Mironov S, et al., Phase II trial of dose-dense doxorubicin plus gemcitabine followed by paclitaxel plus carboplatin in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma and impaired renal function, Cancer, 2007;109(3):549–55.
  45. Milowsky MI, Nanus DM, Maluf FC, et al., Final results of sequential doxorubicin plus gemcitabine and ifosfamide, paclitaxel, and cisplatin chemotherapy in patients with metastatic or locally advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium, J Clin Oncol, 2009;27(25):4062–7.
  46. Gerlinger M, Swanton C, How Darwinian models inform therapeutic failure initiated by clonal heterogeneity in cancer medicine, Br J Cancer, 2010;103(8):1139–43.
  47. Culine S, Theodore C, De Santis M, et al., A phase II study of vinflunine in bladder cancer patients progressing after first-line platinum-containing regimen, Br J Cancer, 2006;94(10):1395–401.
  48. Vaughn DJ, Srinivas S, Stadler WM, et al., Vinflunine in platinum-pretreated patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: results of a large phase 2 study, Cancer, 2009;115(18):4110–17.
  49. Goldie JH, Coldman AJ, The genetic origin of drug resistance in neoplasms: implications for systemic therapy, Cancer Res, 1984;44(9):3643–53.
  50. Azzoli CG, Temin S, Aliff T, et al., 2011 Focused Update of 2009 American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update on Chemotherapy for Stage IV Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer, J Clin Oncol, 2011;29(28):3825–31.
  51. NCCN, 2012. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/PDF/nsclc.pdf)
  52. Behera M, Owonikoko TK, Chen Z, et al., Single agent maintenance therapy for advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis, Lung Cancer, 2012;77(2):331–8.